Union Launches Petition Drive
To Save America’s Postal Service

APWU Web News Article 121-2011, Oct. 28, 2011

President Guffey is asking APWU members to collect signatures on a petition [PDF] to Congress urging senators and representatives to oppose plans to close post offices, shutter mail processing facilities, and drastically degrade service to the American people.

Download Petition [PDF]
Download Flyer [PDF]

In a letter [PDF] to state and local presidents dated Oct. 26, 2011, President Guffey wrote, “It is urgent that we bring as much political pressure as possible to bear against the Postal Service’s plans to dismantle its network of processing, distribution and retail facilities.”

In addition to the petition, the letter includes a flyer [PDF] with the message, “ Closing Post Offices & Mail Processing Centers and Cutting Service is Wrong.”

“No company can grow or even maintain its business by cutting its service. But that’s exactly what the Postal Service is proposing to do,” the flyer says.

In July, the USPS announced plans to close 3,700 post offices; in September, management announced plans to close 252 of approximately 460 mail processing centers.

In early October, the Postal Service posted a notice in the Federal Register announcing its intent to revise service commitments, eliminate overnight delivery of first-class mail and change two-day delivery to three days.

The proposed change in service standards acknowledges what the Postal Service has repeatedly denied: Slashing the mail processing network will result in drastic cuts in service to the American people.

“Reducing the scope and quality of service will not restore the Postal Service to health. It would likely drive mailers away and therefore worsen the Postal Service’s financial problems,” Guffey said.

“If every APWU member filled up one petition, we would have nearly two million signatures,” the letter notes.

The APWU is requesting that locals act at once to make this petition drive a success. Completed petitions should be sent by Nov. 14 to:

Save America’s Postal Service
American Postal Workers Union
1300 L Street NW
Washington DC 20005.

The national union will make sure that House and Senate members receive petitions collected in their districts or states.

 

****THE MANCHESTER AREA LOCAL WILL BE OFFERING THREE PRIZES FOR THE MEMBERS WHO GET THE MOST SIGNATURES****

1ST PLACE - $50

2ND AND 3RD PLACES - $25

[more about fixing USPS finances]

CLIFF GUFFEY, President MYKE REID, Editor Vol. 41, No. 13 • June 24, 2011

Rep. Issa’s Bill:

A Reckless Attack on Postal

Services, Postal Employees

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), the powerful chairman of

the House Committee on Oversight and Government

Reform, has introduced a bill, H.R. 2309, that is “a

reckless assault on postal workers and the Postal

Service,” said APWU President Cliff Guffey.

“The bill would drastically reduce service to the

American people by establishing a commission that

would order $1 billion worth of post of

the

the second year,” he said.

“Incredibly, it fails to address the main cause of the

Postal Service’s

that requires the USPS to pre-fund the healthcare

bene

billion per year,” Guffey said.

“It also completely ignores the fact that the USPS has

massive surpluses in its pension accounts,” the union

president noted. “The overpayments could and should

be used to resolve the Postal Service’s cash crisis.”

fi ce closures infi rst year and $1 billion worth of facility closures infi nancial diffi culties – the unique mandatefi ts of future retirees, at a cost of more than $5.5

Direct Attack on Workers

“The bill is a direct attack on the hard-working men

and women who sort and distribute the nation’s mail,”

Guffey said.

It would create a “solvency authority” with the power

to unilaterally modify collective bargaining agreements

any time the USPS defaults on “any obligation to the

federal government for more than 30 days.”

“The solvency board would be empowered to cut

wages, abolish bene

layoffs,” he said.

In addition, at the expiration of the current collective

bargaining agreements, the bill would increase employees’

costs for healthcare coverage and life insurance, and

eliminate the right to bargain over these bene

would allow the USPS to end Saturday delivery.

fi ts, and end our protection againstfi ts. It also

Propagating a Falsehood

“Rep. Issa insists that the legislation is designed to

avoid a ‘bailout,’ but nothing could be further from the

truth,” Guffey said.

“In fact, the federal government is holding billions of

dollars of excess postal payments to FERS and CSRS.”

(The USPS has a surplus of $6.9 billion in its Federal

Employee Retirement System account, and, according

to two independent actuarial studies, has overpaid the

Civil Service Retirement System account by $50 billion

to $75 billion.)

“The Postal Service does not rely on taxpayer funding,”

he noted, “and doesn’t need a bailout.”

Act Now

“We are continuing to analyze details of the bill,” said

Legislative and Political Director Myke Reid. “We are

working with legislators and their staffs, as well as with

other unions and postal organizations, and will provide

additional information as events warrant.”

“In the meantime, union members must make it clear

to their U.S. representatives that we adamantly oppose

this bill.

“We must let them know that we support an alternate

bill, H.R. 1351, which would address the cause of the

USPS

eliminating collective bargaining rights,” he said.

H.R. 1351, which was introduced by Rep. Stephen

Lynch (D-MA) on April 4, would correct the overfunding

of the pension accounts, and would allow the cashstrapped

agency to use the pension surplus to meet its

retiree health bene

“H.R. 1351 would restore

Postal Service,” Guffey said, “without putting any

burden on American taxpayers.”

fi nancial crisis without slashing service and withoutfi ts pre-funding obligation.fi nancial stability to the

For more information, visit

www.apwu.org.

“The board would be empowered

to unilaterally cut wages, abolish

bene

layoffs.”

– APWU President Cliff Guffey

fi ts, and end protection against

CLIFF GUFFEY, President MYKE REID, Editor Vol. 41, No. 13 • June 24, 2011

Congressman Issa Introduces Postal Reform Act

June 23, 2011 by Lu
Filed under: politics, postal, postal news, postal reform, press releases, usps 

WASHINGTON- Seeking to prevent another taxpayer bailout, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, introduced today legislation to implement sweeping, structural reforms of the United States Postal Service (USPS). The legislation represents the most fundamental reform of the postal service that has been proposed since USPS was first created from the old Post Office Department.

“The Postal Service lost $8.5 billion last year. It is going to lose, at least, $8.3 billion this year. And it is projected to lose $8.5 billion the year after that,” Issa said. “Congress can’t keep kicking the can down the road on out of control labor costs and excess infrastructure of USPS and needs to implement reforms that aren’t a multi-billion dollar taxpayer funded bailout.”

The legislation creates the Postal Service Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority (Authority) which will have a broad mandate to restructure the Postal Service and reduce costs in order to bring the institution back to fiscal solvency when the Postal Service goes into default to the Federal government. The Authority will be disbanded once USPS meets several benchmarks that ensure financial health.

The legislation empanels a separate body, the Commission on Postal Reorganization (CPR) to review postal infrastructure and recommend closures and consolidations to Congress, that will ultimately save the Postal Service at least $2 billion a year. If Congress does not reject the CPR’s recommendations, they become law. The legislation will also remove several legal hurdles that USPS currently faces when it comes to reducing costs, including allowing financially unsustainable retail postal facilities to be closed.

“This legislation encourages USPS to modernize its retail network and enables USPS to act more like a business,” Issa said.

The legislation will eliminate the benefit disparity between the postal workforce and other federal employees, which would have saved $700 million in fiscal year 2010, and it will ensure that postal wages are comparable to the private sector. The bill will also make several changes to USPS revenue and contracting policies.

Issa introduced the bill the day after USPS announced it would stop paying the employer share of its employees’ retirement fund. “USPS has felt the need to give themselves a taxpayer-funded bailout. This unprecedented action indicates the urgent need for these reforms,” Issa said.

The changes in the Postal Reform Act that can be currently quantified will save USPS at least $6 billion per year when fully in effect. The Authority will be required to make additional adjustments to bring costs into line with expenditures in order to avoid the prospect taxpayer bailouts in the future.

Highlights of the Postal Reform Act include:

Postal BRAC: Creates the Commission on Postal Reorganization to eliminate costly excess capacity and facilities. Over its first year the CPR will recommend closures worth $1 billion/year for post offices. Over the second, it will recommend $1 billion/year closures for mail processing and a 30% reduction in management facilities.

Solvency Authority: Creates an Authority modeled on and named after the DC Control Board with a mandate to cut costs, protect universal service, and return USPS to financial solvency. The Authority is triggered into existence when USPS goes into default on any obligation to the federal government for more than 30 days. It has the authority to require renegotiation of existing collective bargaining agreements and the power to unilaterally modify those agreements if renegotiation fails. To accomplish its mission, the Authority may use a supplemental borrowing authority of $10 billion, backed by USPS property as collateral.

5-Day Delivery: Allows USPS to move to 5-day delivery of mail.

Pay Comparability: Clarifies existing law to include wages and benefits in determining total compensation comparability with the entire private sector.

Health and Life Insurance: Requires USPS employees to pay the same health and life insurance premium percentage as other federal workers. This provision is phased in to apply to union employees after their current bargaining agreements expire.

Mediation Arbitration: Modifies the collective bargaining process to the 2003 Presidential Commission recommended mediation-arbitration process. Also requires arbitrators to take into account total compensation comparability and the financial situation of the Postal Service in any decision.

Cost Coverage: Requires all market-dominant products to cover costs, while maintaining the CPI price cap.

Underwater Products: For classes below 90% cost coverage, rates are increased by 5% annually above the price cap.

Non-Profit Discount: The non-profit advertising discount is reduced by 5% a year from 40% to 10% of the most closely corresponding class.

Political Committees: Ends the rate preferences for national and state political committees.

Advertising: Authorizes USPS to sell advertising space on USPS facilities and vehicles. All advertising must maintain at least 200% cost coverage and be consistent with USPS’s integrity.

State Government Services: Authorizes USPS to provide services for state governments that enhances USPS’s value to the public. Such services must not interfere with or detract from the value of postal services.

Contracting accountability and transparency: Reaffirms accountability for delegations of contracting authority and requires their disclosure when outside the functional contracting unit. Requires disclosure of most noncompetitive purchase requests above $250,000.

Contracting ethics: Requires USPS to establish regulations to prevent conflicts of interest in the contracting area, with ethics officials reviewing any ethics issues that arise.

Read a copy of Issa’s legislation here .

 

 Join Us for a Lobby Day to Defend the Middle Class!

 



Wednesday, June 8

11:30AM - 5:00PM

Event Location

NH State House
107 North Main Street
Concord, NH 03301-4951



Check-in:
1:30am
America Votes
4 Park Street, Room 302
Concord, NH



EVENT INFORMATION:



Weeks ago, NH House Speaker William O'Brien announced that he would call for a May 25 vote to override Governor Lynch's veto of HB 474 (the so-called "Right to Work" bill). But when the big day arrived, Speaker O'Brien took action to postpone the critical vote - because by the House majority leadership's own admission, the power-hungry politicians who want to make NH the next RTW state do not have the votes they need to overturn the Governor's veto.

That's just not good enough for New Hampshire workers and families- and we're not backing down until we're 100% sure that Granite State working families are protected from "Right to Work" and other reckless legislative attacks on the middle class.









Please join us for a Lobby Day to Defend the Middle Class on Wednesday, June 8th! 

Update on “Right to Work” in NH & How You Can Help

 

The vote on RTW is on the Legislative Calendar for this Wednesday May 25. The AFL-CIO is asking us for member turnout.  If you are on  T1 or T-3 and can join us for part of the day that would be helpful too.

 

We will meet at the America Votes office on the 3rd floor at 4 Park Street. People will be at the office starting at 7:30 am. and there will be coffee, bagels and muffins for us when we arrive. Between 8 and 8:30 there will be a quick briefing and packets with flyer will be given to everyone.  Labor is sponsoring a light breakfast for the legislators at the City Auditorium at 2 Prince St. and you are welcome to attend that event or you can go directly to the State House.

 

We would like to have people lining the Hall of Flags with signs as the Legislators enter the State House and would like a lot of people on the 2nd floor at both end of the hallway near the 2 entrances to Representatives Hall. Activists will talk to legislators in those two areas before the session begins and as legislators go in & out until the vote is taken. We will also want to have plenty of folks in the gallery throughout the day.

 

Many things can happen and with this House Leadership we will definitely be kept on our toes. We are asking people to be courteous to the Legislator inside and outside of the State House. There will almost certainly be a group of people who will be there primarily to instigate! Don’t let them.

 

Please call me to let me know if you can get to join us for the day or even for part of the day. To the extent possible we would like to match people up with their Rep and ask them to talk to their Rep for a minute before the session begins.

 

Feel free to call me for more information and please do not hesitate to pass my cell phone number on to any members who will be coming on Wednesday, but may not be able to join us at 8 am. You are welcome to call me to find out what is going on or to make sure that the vote has not already occurred.

 

This is a crucial time in this battle here in NH. Please make every effort to participate!

 

This fight is critical to the future of New Hampshire and the stability of our families. Take a moment to let your representative know where you stand!

The hallways of the State House in Concord were flooded Wednesday with working men and women, firefighters, religious leaders, and public servants fighting the devastating “right to work” legislation, which will be taken to another vote within the next week. Click here to see news coverage showing the crowded hallways in the State House.

Joining workers in Concord on Wednesday was former Republican State Senator Mark Hounsell, who used to be a sponsor of “right to work” legislation in the 1980’s. He is now an outspoken opponent of the legislation, standing alongside the rights of workers to freely bargain. Click here for pictures of workers lobbying in Concord on Wednesday.

 

Janice Kelble

 

Legislative Director

 

603 513-8176 cell

Legislators Must Apply
Pension Overpayments to Pre-Funding Bill

APWU News Bulletin 10-2011, May 17, 2011 | PDF

In testimony [PDF] before a Senate Subcommittee on May 17, APWU President Cliff Guffey urged legislators to take immediate action to restore financial stability to the cash-strapped agency.

President Cliff Guffey Testifies on behalf of the APWU.

President Cliff Guffey testifies for the APWU.

“This is not a request for a subsidy or bailout of the Postal Service,” Guffey said at the hearing before the Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security.

“The Postal Service is very capable of dealing with the challenges it is facing because of declining mail volumes and a shift to electronic transmissions,” the union president said. “What it cannot sustain is the burden of the unique and unreasonable requirement that it pre-fund its retiree health benefits over a 10-year period.” No other government agency or private company bears this burden.

The hearing was called to examine management plans and legislative proposals to address the USPS financial crisis, including an updated version of a bill introduced last year by Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE), chairman of the subcommittee.

A Mixed Bag

Guffey praised provisions of Sen. Carper’s “POST Act” (S. 1010 [PDF]) that would permit the USPS to use overpayments to its pension accounts to meet the pre-funding obligations, noting they would “give the Postal Service more than $5 billion in breathing room each year.”

But he also criticized several negative aspects of the bill. The proposed legislation would give the Postal Service authority to close post offices solely for financial reasons, and would require arbitrators to consider the financial health of the USPS when contract negotiations end in arbitration, he pointed out.

Guffey objected to proposals to allow management greater freedom to close small post offices, saying consideration must be given to the availability of postal services in these communities.

“We are sensitive to the cost and the possibility of deficits in small postal offices,” the union president added. “In our new National Agreement, we have agreed to flexible schedules and to the use of lower-wage and temporary workers in small facilities where such savings might increase the viability of small postal facilities.” Cutting service is not the answer to USPS financial difficulties, Guffey said.

Postal Workers Get the Blame

The union president also expressed the APWU’s “unalterable opposition” to proposals that would change the standards for arbitration when contract negotiations end in an impasse.

“The draft legislation we have seen would destroy the fairness of postal bargaining in several ways: It would put an arbitrary time limit on interest arbitration; it would make postal employees pay the price for congressionally-caused deficits employees have been powerless to prevent or alleviate, and it would place a cap on increases in postal wages.

“These provisions would gut free collective bargaining by postal employees, and the APWU is adamantly opposed to them,” Guffey said.

The APWU appreciates Sen. Carper’s leadership in addressing the pre-funding requirement and the overfunding of postal pension funds, Guffey said. “We will help in any way we can to support sensible legislation that does not seek to address postal financial problems at the expense of postal employees.”

APWU members are encouraged to contact their legislators and urge them to support bills to correct the USPS financial crisis. “We must make legislative action a priority,” Guffey said.

[more about fixing USPS finances]

[back to top]

 

The fight continues against bad legislation in Concord!

After voters in Hillsborough strongly rejected Speaker O’Brien’s candidate in his own district’s special election Tuesday night, hundreds of New Hampshire’s working men and women poured into Concord Wednesday to lobby against the falsely-labeled “right to work” legislation, which would severely restrict the rights of employers and employees to negotiate a union contract. Special recognition goes out to AFT-NH, APWU, Firefighters, IBEW Local 2320, NALC, NEA-NH, Painters Council 35, SEIU Local 1984, and Teamsters for their hard work in the special election and a huge thanks to all the others that contributed to this big win!

Our work continues in our push against anti-worker legislation in Concord. Every day calls and emails pour into the offices of our state representatives. The voices of working men and women are being heard! Use our simple, one-click tool to write your representatives to help stop this bad bill!

This fight is critical to the future of New Hampshire and the stability of our families. Take a moment to let your representative know where you stand!

The hallways of the State House in Concord were flooded Wednesday with working men and women, firefighters, religious leaders, and public servants fighting the devastating “right to work” legislation, which will be taken to another vote within the next week. Click here to see news coverage showing the crowded hallways in the State House.

Joining workers in Concord on Wednesday was former Republican State Senator Mark Hounsell, who used to be a sponsor of “right to work” legislation in the 1980’s. He is now an outspoken opponent of the legislation, standing alongside the rights of workers to freely bargain. Click here for pictures of workers lobbying in Concord on Wednesday.

This is our moment! Make sure your voice is heard in Concord to help stop this legislative overreach!

Click here to unsubscribe

URGENT: The New Hampshire Senate is expected to vote on anti-worker, anti-union legislation mislabeled as "right to work" on Wednesday.

Please take action immediately. Write your New Hampshire state senator today at:

http://act.aflcio.org/c/180/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1961

 

  

ANTI-WORKER VOTE IMMINENT

Corporate CEOs, many of whom come from out of state, spent more than $1 billion nationally to elect politicians who share their agenda—and now they’re demanding payback in New Hampshire in the form of attacks on workers' rights.

Fight back: Tell your New Hampshire state senator to reject so-called “right to work."

Then, share this alert far and wide on Facebook and Twitter.

 

 

Dear AFL-CIO Friend,

I am writing to you to ask for your help in defeating the anti-union legislation mislabeled as "right to work."

So-called “right to work” laws have been a disaster wherever they’ve been implemented. These laws weaken not just unions, but the overall economy in all states that have adopted it.

Unions fight for higher wages for all workers. So if this bill passes, all of New Hampshire’s working families will be hurt—as wages and benefits are cut for union and nonunion workers alike. This is nothing but a giveaway to greedy employers who want to slash wages and benefits for New Hampshire workers.

Urge your state senator to reject the so-called “right to work” bill now.

This bill is being pushed by out-of-state corporate CEOs who want to eliminate workers' rights. They have been trying to pass this legislation unsuccessfully here in New Hampshire for many years.

With the new House and Senate majorities, they now may have the votes to pass it. This bare-knuckled attack on workers' rights already has passed the House. The New Hampshire Senate is our last line of defense.

Contact your New Hampshire state senator now and urge him or her to vote NO on the so-called “right to work” bill.

Then, please:

  1. Forward this message to at least five friends in New Hampshire, and ask them to do the same thing, whether they are in a union or not.
  2. Share this alert far and wide on Facebook and Twitter.

Thank you.

In solidarity,

Mark MacKenzie
President, New Hampshire AFL-CIO

P.S. This vote is expected to be closer than any anti-worker vote in our state’s history. This is the moment to act. And your individual decision to act—or not act—could mean the difference for New Hampshire workers for a generation.

Act now: Tell your New Hampshire state senator to reject "right to work."


Then, spread the word on Facebook and Twitter.

Click here to unsubscribe

Tell Congress: Support H.R. 1351

APWU Web News Article 041-2011, April 11, 2011

Tell Congress: Support H.R. 1351

Contact Your Legislators

H.R. 1351 Co-sponsors

APWU members are encouraged to contact their members of Congress and urge them to support H.R. 1351, an important measure that would restore financial stability to the Postal Service.

This bill, the “USPS Pension Obligation Recalculation and Restoration Act of 2011,” would correct the overfunding of the Postal Service’s pension accounts, and would allow the cash-strapped agency to use any surplus to meet its retiree health benefits pre-funding obligation.

As of May 5, H.R. 1351 — introduced on April 4 by Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) — had 35 co-sponsors. APWU President Cliff Guffey urged locals and state organizations to contact their U.S. representatives and ask them to support this critical measure.

“If your members of Congress are not on the list, please call them and urge them to do so,” Guffey said. “If they have signed onto this measure, thank them for their support.”

H.R. 1351 instructs the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to recalculate USPS payments to the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) using updated technology. Independent actuarial studies have concluded that as a result of improper funding formulas, the USPS has overpaid CSRS by $50 billion to $75 billion. FERS overpayments are estimated at $6.9 billion.

If any overpayments are found during OPM’s recalculation, any surplus would be transferred to the Postal Service. OPM would also be required to refund the USPS any money it overpaid to its FERS account. The Postal Service could then use this money to meet its pre-funding requirements.

“This bill would help put the Postal Service back on track to fiscal solvency,” Guffey said. “In order to protect the USPS for the future, we need all the help we can get on Capitol Hill.”

RSS feed

Stay Up To Date

Join the email list!

Upcoming Meetings

  • Mar 4
    March Membership Meeting,  Manchester
     

Follow Us!